5348 W Vegas Dr

5348 W Vegas Dr, Las Vegas, NV 89108, USA

Open in Maps (opens in new tab) Maps Open in Maps (opens in new tab)

Pharos Production Inc.

44-B Eugene Konovalets Str, Suite 201, Kyiv, 01133

5.0

( 11)

Reviews aren't verified by Google, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified.

Learn more

Open in Maps (opens in new tab) Maps Open in Maps (opens in new tab)

Get directions (opens in new tab)

Reviewed by Dr. Dmytro Nasyrov, Founder and CTO

Offshore Development Center

Pharos Production sets up dedicated Offshore Development Centers (ODC) that function as an extension of your engineering organization.

90+engineers
18industries
13+years in business

90 reviews](https://clutch.co/profile/pharos-production) 143 reviews](https://www.goodfirms.co/company/pharos-production) 10 reviews](https://maps.app.goo.gl/o148fAFju4iRdc7i7) 54 reviews](https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Pharos-Production-Reviews-E2438061.htm) 18 reviews](https://www.g2.com/sellers/pharos-production) ★★★★★ 5.0 315+ verified reviews

Your business results matter

Achieve them with minimized risk through our bespoke innovation capabilities

Your contact details

Name Please enter your name

Telegram / WhatsApp

Email Please enter a valid email address

Message Please enter your message

Yes, I agree with Data Privacy and Legal Notice\* required

Need NDA

Book a call

We typically reply within 1 business day

SOC 2 Type II GDPR ISO 27001NDA Protected

Aligned with these frameworks. Audit reports and certifications available on request.

Reviewed and updated

Last reviewed April 27, 2026 by Dmytro Nasyrov, Founder and CTO. Content reflects Pharos Production delivery data as of the review date. Editorial policy.

Reviewed by Dmytro Nasyrov

Founder and CTO

23+ years in custom software development. Led 70+ projects across FinTech, healthcare, Web3 and enterprise. aligned with ISO 27001 team.

What is an offshore development center?

An offshore development center (ODC) is a stable, dedicated engineering team that works as an extension of a client's own team across a multi-year engagement. It is not per-project outsourcing, and it is not a body shop. Authoritative citations12 sources

DORA State of DevOps ReportThe Google DORA State of DevOps annual report defines the four key software delivery metrics (deployment frequency, lead time for changes, mean time to restore, change failure rate) that we instrument on every production engagement to benchmark delivery performance. dora.dev](https://dora.dev/research/)
Stack Overflow Developer SurveyThe Stack Overflow Developer Survey documents language, framework, database and tooling adoption across tens of thousands of engineers annually, and we use the trend lines to validate stack choices against hiring pool depth for each client. survey.stackoverflow.co](https://survey.stackoverflow.co/)
ThoughtWorks Technology RadarThe ThoughtWorks Technology Radar tracks tools, platforms, techniques and languages across adopt, trial, assess and hold rings twice yearly, and is a cross-check we use to validate architectural recommendations against industry consensus. thoughtworks.com](https://www.thoughtworks.com/radar)
Google SRE BookThe Google SRE book codifies service-level objectives, error budgets, incident response and postmortem culture that our production readiness gates adopt directly when handing over a platform to a client operations team. sre.google](https://sre.google/sre-book/table-of-contents/)
Martin Fowler blikiMartin Fowler's bliki is the most cited reference for enterprise architecture patterns including microservices, strangler fig, CQRS, event sourcing and refactoring, which shapes how we describe and implement architecture decisions in ADRs on every client engagement. martinfowler.com](https://martinfowler.com/)
Gartner Custom Application Services Magic QuadrantGartner publishes multiple Magic Quadrant reports covering custom application services, digital engineering and outsourced development that identify market leaders, completeness of vision and niche specialists across the global software services industry. gartner.com](https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/research/magic-quadrant)
ISO 27001 Information Security StandardISO 27001:2022 defines the internationally recognized information security management system requirements that Pharos Production operates under, shaping the control framework we inherit and extend for client software engagements. iso.org](https://www.iso.org/standard/27001)
OWASP Top 10The OWASP Top 10 ranks the highest-impact web application security risks and is the single most cited threat reference for application security programs, which every Pharos build is reviewed against before production release. owasp.org](https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/)
NIST Secure Software Development FrameworkNIST SSDF SP 800-218 defines secure development practices including threat modelling, SBOM generation, vulnerability disclosure and supply chain controls, which we treat as the baseline Software Development Lifecycle checklist on every client engagement. csrc.nist.gov](https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-218/final)
CNCF Cloud Native LandscapeThe CNCF Cloud Native Landscape maps the full cloud-native ecosystem across orchestration, runtime, observability, security and database categories, useful reference material we consult when validating platform choices for client Kubernetes and service mesh engagements. landscape.cncf.io](https://landscape.cncf.io/)
Accelerate by Forsgren, Humble, KimAccelerate distills the multi-year DORA research program into the book-length case for DevOps practices correlated with high-performance software delivery, and is the single most cited academic reference for the delivery metrics we ship inside every client engagement. itrevolution.com](https://itrevolution.com/product/accelerate/)
IEEE SWEBOKThe IEEE Software Engineering Body of Knowledge codifies the professional knowledge areas covering requirements, design, construction, testing, maintenance, configuration management and engineering economics that underpin every professional software services engagement. computer.org](https://www.computer.org/education/bodies-of-knowledge/software-engineering)

What we do not do

Per-ticket outsourcing where scope changes weekly
Low-cost body shops with 8+ hour time zone gaps and no English fluency
Engagements without a named client engineering lead
Projects with no intention of a long-term (12+ month) relationship
Work where the client has no capacity to review code

ODC engagements at Pharos at a glance

Active ODCs: 12+ active offshore development centers across SaaS, FinTech, healthcare-adjacent and blockchain
Team size: Typical ODC is 5-15 engineers; smallest is 3, largest is 22
Retention: Median team retention above 80% across 12-month rolling windows; churn visible to the client
Time zone: UTC+1 to UTC+3 with 5-8 hours of daily overlap with US East and Central Europe
Pricing: Blended ODC rates from $7,500/engineer/month depending on role, seniority and duration
Review cadence: Quarterly performance reviews shared with the client; named buddy on client side for every engineer
Languages: Team English fluency at B2 minimum, typically C1; client communication is documented in writing

How we run an offshore development center

Pharos Verified Delivery applied to an ODC means every engineer on the team has a named role, a named buddy on the client side and a quarterly performance review the client sees. No hidden churn, no silent backfills.

Pharos Verified Delivery·4-phase methodology with typical durations and deliverables

Week 0__Week 2-4__Week 8-24__Launch day__Ongoing

Technical validation
- Architecture proposal
- Scope refined estimate

0% on-schedule with discovery

Working demos every sprint
- CTO review at milestones
- ADRs documented

Transparent progress tracking

Monitoring and alerting
- Security audit Pen test
- Runbooks and rollback

ISO 27001 aligned

Security patches
- Performance tuning
- 4h SLA response

Continuous improvement

Pharos Verified Delivery applied to 0+ production applications since 2013

ODC engagements that stuck

Every engagement below ran for at least 14 months with client retention above 80% of the team.

SaaS platform ODC (Q4 2023 to present)Since Q4 2023 · B2B SaaS, US

Before

US-based client burning $140K/month on recruiting with an unfilled engineering backlog.

After

Stood up a 7-engineer ODC in 10 weeks; backlog stabilized within 2 quarters. Team retention 86% after 18 months.

The client interviewed every candidate. We did not substitute anyone without approval. Trust comes from doing exactly what you said you would do.

FinTech ODC expansion (Q2 2024)Q2 2024 · Payments, EU

Before

Internal team at capacity; 6-month feature freeze on roadmap items.

After

Added 4 engineers to existing ODC; feature freeze lifted within 7 weeks of onboarding. Feature throughput doubled without regressions.

We onboarded with paired programming for the first two weeks. That is the single practice that most predicts whether an ODC becomes productive fast.

Blockchain ODC (Q1 2024)Q1 2024 · DeFi, global

Before

Audited Solidity codebase with no in-house auditor and 9-month audit backlog.

After

Built a 3-engineer ODC with a Solidity auditor retained fractionally. Audit lead time cut from 9 months to 6 weeks.

ODC is not always large teams. A 3-person team with the right roles can change a business more than a 20-person team with the wrong ones.

Client names anonymized under NDA. Full case studies at /cases/.

When an ODC is not the right answer

ODCs work when there is a stable multi-year scope. When scope is unclear or unstable, an ODC creates waste and tension. We decline in those cases:

Projects we decline

Fewer than 12 months of stable scope ahead
Client has no engineering lead to review work daily
Work mostly involves rapidly shifting 1-week projects
Budget is unclear or contingent on monthly approval
The client wants offshore rates but onshore working hours

What we recommend instead

For shorter engagements, staff augmentation is a better fit: individual engineers embedded into a client team for 3-9 months with no ODC overhead. We will openly recommend staff augmentation instead of an ODC when the scope does not justify the investment.

Pharos Production offshore development centre observations

Observations from 17 ODC engagements delivered 2019-2026 across FinTech, healthcare, SaaS and enterprise.

ODCs with embedded technical leadership delivered 2.4x more net value per engineer-month than pure execution ODCs in matched cohorts.
Real-time overlap of 3+ hours correlated with 33 percent faster delivery than async-only engagements in matched projects.
Near-shore ODCs (GDPR zone, 1-3 hour delta) had 2.1x lower turnover than far-shore in our portfolio.
Teams of 8 to 20 ODC engineers scaled linearly when paired 1:2 with customer-internal team members; beyond that ratio, coordination overhead dominated.

Observations reflect the Pharos Production ODC portfolio 2019-2026 and do not generalise beyond surveyed engagements.

Offshore development centre outlook 2026-2027

How to evaluate an offshore development centre in 90 days

ODC partnerships below 6 of 8 at 90 days correlated with 4 of 6 churn events in our customer-relationship history.

Lesson from production: the async-only trap

A US-based SaaS customer engaged a far-shore ODC in 2022 with a 9-hour time zone delta and no scheduled overlap. Six months in, delivery had slowed 40 percent despite 12 engineers added. Root cause: the async-only model created a 24-hour roundtrip on any clarifying question; the ODC team worked around ambiguity by building reasonable-but-wrong features. We negotiated a 3-hour overlap window, added weekly joint planning and retros, and paired senior ODC engineers with US-side counterparts. Within 60 days, delivery throughput exceeded pre-ODC baseline by 30 percent. The lesson: async collaboration is valuable, but strategic decisions need real-time bandwidth, and "no overlap" ODCs deliver execution without judgement.

Honest note on offshore

Offshore engineering only works when both sides treat it as an extension of the team, not a cost lever. We have declined engagements where the client wanted transactional outsourcing framed as ODC.

Platforms We Work With

Trusted by Coinbase, Consensys, Core Scientific, MicroStrategy, Gate.io and 10+ more Web3 and enterprise platforms

16+ partners

Our 16 technology partners include:

Consensys
Gate Io
Coinbase
Ludo
Core Scientific
Debut Infotech
Axoni
Alchemy
Starkware
Mara Holdings
Microstrategy
Nubank
Okx
Uniswap
Riot
Leeway Hertz
Consensys
Gate Io
Coinbase
Ludo](https://ludo.com/)
Core Scientific
Debut Infotech
Axoni
Alchemy
Starkware
Mara Holdings
Microstrategy
Nubank
Okx
Uniswap
Riot
Leeway Hertz

Dmytro Nasyrov

Founder and CTO Pharos Production

Ask the founder a question

LinkedIn X (Twitter)

I design and build reliable software solutions – from lightweight apps to high-load distributed systems and blockchain platforms.

PhD in Artificial Intelligence, MSc in Computer Science (with honors), MSc in Electronics & Precision Mechanics.

13 years in architecture of great software solutions tailored to customer needs for startups and enterprises
23 years of practical enterprise customized software production experience
Lecturer at the National Kyiv Polytechnic University
Doctor of Philosophy in Artificial Intelligence
Master’s degree in Computer Science, completed with excellence
Master’s degree in Electronics and precision mechanics engineering

MVP

MVP sprint

Scoped MVP with core user flows, clean codebase and production-ready deployment.

$10,000 - $25,000

Popular choice

Production

Production release

Full-feature build, QA, CI/CD and post-launch stabilization with SLA-backed support.

$27,000 - $55,000

Full-cycle

Full-cycle platform

End-to-end engagement: discovery, architecture, build, DevOps, QA and long-term evolution.

$45,000 - $85,000

Prices vary based on project scope, complexity, timeline and requirements. Contact us for a personalized estimate.

Or select the appropriate interaction model

Request staff augmentation

Need extra hands on your software project? Our developers can jump in at any stage – from architecture to auditing – and integrate seamlessly with your team to fill any technical gaps.

Popular choice

Hire dedicated experts

Whether you’re building from scratch or scaling fast, our engineers are ready to step in. You stay in control, and we handle the code.

Outsource your project

From first line to final audit, we handle the entire development process. We will deliver secure, production-ready software, while you can focus on your business.

Frameworks 26AI 45Blockchains 37DevOps 15Clouds 6Databases 15Brokers 7Tests 6Programming 18UI/UX 12

Frameworks

Backend Frameworks 8

Spring Boot

Erlang OTP

\ \ NodeJS](/content/technologies/nodejs-development-services/index.html)

Phoenix

NestJS

Django FastAPI

Express.js

Front End Frameworks 8

\ \ React](/content/technologies/react-development-services/index.html)

Next.JS

Svelte

\ \ Angular](/content/technologies/angular-development-services/index.html) Vue.js

Remix

Astro

Nuxt.js

Mobile Apps Frameworks 10

\ \ iOS](/content/technologies/swift-and-swiftui-development-services/index.html) \ \ Android](/content/technologies/kotlin-development-services/index.html) \ \ Flutter](/content/technologies/flutter-development-services/index.html) \ \ React Native](/content/technologies/react-native-development-services/index.html)

Capacitors

Ionic

\ \ Swift](/content/technologies/swift-and-swiftui-development-services/index.html) \ \ Kotlin](/content/technologies/kotlin-development-services/index.html) \ \ Java](/content/technologies/java-development-services/index.html) Dart

AI and Machine Learning

LLM Providers 8

OpenAI GPT Anthropic Claude

Google Gemini

Meta Llama

Mistral AI

Cohere

Ollama

xAI Grok

AI Frameworks 15

LangChain LangGraph

CrewAI

AutoGen

Hugging Face PyTorch TensorFlow

scikit-learn

LlamaIndex Keras

XGBoost

LightGBM

OpenCV

spaCy

ONNX Runtime

Vector Databases 7

Pinecone

Weaviate

Qdrant

Chroma

pgvector

Milvus

FAISS

MLOps and Infrastructure 11

MLflow

Weights & Biases

DVC

Kubeflow

AWS SageMaker Azure ML Google Vertex AI

NVIDIA Triton

Airflow

Ray Serve

vLLM

AI Agent Tools 4

OpenAI Agents SDK Claude MCP

Semantic Kernel

Haystack

Blockchains

Private and Public Blockchains 33

Ethereum

TON

Corda

Tron

Hedera

Stellar

Consensys GoQuorum

Solana

Arbitrum

Binance Smart Chain (BSC)

Sei

Celo

Hyperledger

MultiversX

IOTA

Polkadot

Aptos

Neo

Flow

Algorand

Avalanche

EOS

Optimism

Polygon

Cosmos

Sui

Tezos

Ontology

Fantom

NEAR Protocol

VeChain

Base

IPFS

Cloud Blockchain Solutions 4

Amazon Managed Blockchain

Amazon QLDB

IBM Blockchain

Oracle Blockchain

DevOps

DevOps Tools 15

\ \ Kubernetes](/content/technologies/docker-and-kubernetes-development-services/index.html)

Terraform

\ \ Docker](/content/technologies/docker-and-kubernetes-development-services/index.html)

Istio

Prometheus

Grafana

Jenkins

ArgoCD

Ansible

GitHub Actions

GitLab CI

Pulumi

Datadog

New Relic

Vault

Clouds

Clouds 6

\ \ Amazon Web Services](/content/technologies/aws-development-services/index.html) \ \ Azure](/content/technologies/azure-development-services/index.html) \ \ Google Cloud](/content/technologies/google-cloud-development-services/index.html)

Cloudflare

Vercel

DigitalOcean

Databases

Databases 15

PostgreSQL

MySQL MariaDB

Redis

Cassandra

Neo4J

MongoDB

Elasticsearch

Solr

Ignite

ClickHouse

TimescaleDB

DynamoDB

Supabase

CockroachDB

ScyllaDB

Brokers

Event and Message Brokers 7

Kafka

RabbitMQ

Flink

Apache Pulsar

Amazon SQS

Amazon SNS

NATS

Tests

Test Automation Tools 6

Postman

Appium

Cucumber

Selenium

JMeter

Cypress

Programming

Programming Languages 18

\ \ Solidity](/content/technologies/solidity-development-services/index.html)

FunC

\ \ Rust](/content/technologies/rust-development-services/index.html) \ \ GoLang](/content/technologies/golang-development-services/index.html) \ \ Elixir](/content/technologies/elixir-development-services/index.html)

Erlang

C++

\ \ Java](/content/technologies/java-development-services/index.html)

JavaScript

\ \ TypeScript](/content/technologies/typescript-development-services/index.html)

Scala

Python C# .NET PHP Ruby Dart

SQL

UI/UX

UI/UX Design Tools 12

Figma

Zeplin

InVision

Sketch

Miro

Marvel

Balsamiq

Photoshop

Illustrator

After Effects

Corel Draw

Frameworks 26

Frameworks

Backend Frameworks 8

Spring Boot

Erlang OTP

\ \ NodeJS](/content/technologies/nodejs-development-services/index.html)

Phoenix

NestJS

Express.js

Front End Frameworks 8

\ \ React](/content/technologies/react-development-services/index.html)

Next.JS

Svelte

Remix

Astro

Nuxt.js

Mobile Apps Frameworks 10

Capacitors

Ionic

AI 45

AI and Machine Learning

LLM Providers 8

Google Gemini

Meta Llama

Mistral AI

Cohere

Ollama

xAI Grok

AI Frameworks 15

CrewAI

AutoGen

scikit-learn

XGBoost

LightGBM

OpenCV

spaCy

ONNX Runtime

Vector Databases 7

Pinecone

Weaviate

Qdrant

Chroma

pgvector

Milvus

FAISS

MLOps and Infrastructure 11

MLflow

Weights & Biases

DVC

Kubeflow

NVIDIA Triton

Airflow

Ray Serve

vLLM

AI Agent Tools 4

Semantic Kernel

Haystack

Blockchains 37

Blockchains

Private and Public Blockchains 33

Ethereum

TON

Corda

Tron

Hedera

Stellar

Consensys GoQuorum

Solana

Arbitrum

Binance Smart Chain (BSC)

Sei

Celo

Hyperledger

MultiversX

IOTA

Polkadot

Aptos

Neo

Flow

Algorand

Avalanche

EOS

Optimism

Polygon

Cosmos

Sui

Tezos

Ontology

Fantom

NEAR Protocol

VeChain

Base

IPFS

Cloud Blockchain Solutions 4

Amazon Managed Blockchain

Amazon QLDB

IBM Blockchain

Oracle Blockchain

DevOps 15

DevOps

DevOps Tools 15

\ \ Kubernetes](/content/technologies/docker-and-kubernetes-development-services/index.html)

Terraform

\ \ Docker](/content/technologies/docker-and-kubernetes-development-services/index.html)

Istio

Prometheus

Grafana

Jenkins

ArgoCD

Ansible

GitHub Actions

GitLab CI

Pulumi

Datadog

New Relic

Vault

Clouds 6

Clouds

Clouds 6

Cloudflare

Vercel

DigitalOcean

Databases 15

Databases

Databases 15

PostgreSQL

MySQL MariaDB

Redis

Cassandra

Neo4J

MongoDB

Elasticsearch

Solr

Ignite

ClickHouse

TimescaleDB

DynamoDB

Supabase

CockroachDB

ScyllaDB

Brokers 7

Brokers

Event and Message Brokers 7

Kafka

RabbitMQ

Flink

Apache Pulsar

Amazon SQS

Amazon SNS

NATS

Tests 6

Tests

Test Automation Tools 6

Postman

Appium

Cucumber

Selenium

JMeter

Cypress

Programming 18

Programming

Programming Languages 18

\ \ Solidity](/content/technologies/solidity-development-services/index.html)

FunC

Erlang

C++

\ \ Java](/content/technologies/java-development-services/index.html)

JavaScript

\ \ TypeScript](/content/technologies/typescript-development-services/index.html)

Scala

SQL

UI/UX 12

UI/UX

UI/UX Design Tools 12

Figma

Zeplin

InVision

Sketch

Miro

Marvel

Balsamiq

Photoshop

Illustrator

After Effects

Corel Draw

- -

0+ industry awards

Our Process

An approach to the development cycle

The Pharos Delivery Framework divides every project into 2-week sprints. After each sprint there is a retrospective of the work done, planning for the next sprint, a report of the work done and a plan for the next sprint. This methodology is why agile projects are 3x more likely to succeed than waterfall (Standish Group CHAOS Report, 2024).

2 days

Team Assembly

Our company starts and assembles an entire project specialists with the perfect blend of skills and experience to start the work.

1-4 months

MVP

We’ll design, build, and launch your MVP, ensuring it meets the core requirements of your software solution.

6-12 months

Production

We’ll create a complete software solution that is custom-made to meet your exact specifications.

Ongoing

Continuous Support

Our company will be right there with you, keeping your software solution running smoothly, fixing issues, and rolling out updates.

FAQ

Last updated: April 27, 2026

Quick answers to common questions about custom software development, pricing, process and technology.

Expand all (5)Collapse all (0)

Type to filter questions and answers. Use Topic to narrow the list.

Showing all 5

Clear filters

No matches

Try a different keyword, change the topic, or clear filters

How quickly can an ODC ramp up?