5348 W Vegas Dr

5348 W Vegas Dr, Las Vegas, NV 89108, USA

Open in Maps (opens in new tab) Maps Open in Maps (opens in new tab)

Pharos Production Inc.

44-B Eugene Konovalets Str, Suite 201, Kyiv, 01133

5.0

( 11)

Reviews aren't verified by Google, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified.

Learn more

Open in Maps (opens in new tab) Maps Open in Maps (opens in new tab)

Get directions (opens in new tab)

Reviewed by Dr. Dmytro Nasyrov, Founder and CTO

White Label Development Services

Pharos Production provides White Label Software Development services that let agencies, consultancies and SaaS companies deliver custom software under their own brand.

90+engineers
18industries
13+years in business

90 reviews](https://clutch.co/profile/pharos-production) 143 reviews](https://www.goodfirms.co/company/pharos-production) 10 reviews](https://maps.app.goo.gl/o148fAFju4iRdc7i7) 54 reviews](https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Pharos-Production-Reviews-E2438061.htm) 18 reviews](https://www.g2.com/sellers/pharos-production) ★★★★★ 5.0 315+ verified reviews

Your business results matter

Achieve them with minimized risk through our bespoke innovation capabilities

Your contact details

Name Please enter your name

Telegram / WhatsApp

Email Please enter a valid email address

Message Please enter your message

Yes, I agree with Data Privacy and Legal Notice\* required

Need NDA

Book a call

We typically reply within 1 business day

SOC 2 Type II GDPR ISO 27001NDA Protected

Aligned with these frameworks. Audit reports and certifications available on request.

Reviewed and updated

Last reviewed April 27, 2026 by Dmytro Nasyrov, Founder and CTO. Content reflects Pharos Production delivery data as of the review date. Editorial policy.

Reviewed by Dmytro Nasyrov

Founder and CTO

23+ years in custom software development. Led 70+ projects across FinTech, healthcare, Web3 and enterprise. aligned with ISO 27001 team.

What is white-label development?

White-label development is engineering work delivered under another brand, typically a digital agency or product company that resells custom builds to its own clients. The Pharos team is invisible to the end client; the agency owns the relationship, the contract and the project narrative. Authoritative citations12 sources

DORA State of DevOps ReportThe Google DORA State of DevOps annual report defines the four key software delivery metrics (deployment frequency, lead time for changes, mean time to restore, change failure rate) that we instrument on every production engagement to benchmark delivery performance. dora.dev](https://dora.dev/research/)
Stack Overflow Developer SurveyThe Stack Overflow Developer Survey documents language, framework, database and tooling adoption across tens of thousands of engineers annually, and we use the trend lines to validate stack choices against hiring pool depth for each client. survey.stackoverflow.co](https://survey.stackoverflow.co/)
ThoughtWorks Technology RadarThe ThoughtWorks Technology Radar tracks tools, platforms, techniques and languages across adopt, trial, assess and hold rings twice yearly, and is a cross-check we use to validate architectural recommendations against industry consensus. thoughtworks.com](https://www.thoughtworks.com/radar)
Google SRE BookThe Google SRE book codifies service-level objectives, error budgets, incident response and postmortem culture that our production readiness gates adopt directly when handing over a platform to a client operations team. sre.google](https://sre.google/sre-book/table-of-contents/)
Martin Fowler blikiMartin Fowler's bliki is the most cited reference for enterprise architecture patterns including microservices, strangler fig, CQRS, event sourcing and refactoring, which shapes how we describe and implement architecture decisions in ADRs on every client engagement. martinfowler.com](https://martinfowler.com/)
Gartner Custom Application Services Magic QuadrantGartner publishes multiple Magic Quadrant reports covering custom application services, digital engineering and outsourced development that identify market leaders, completeness of vision and niche specialists across the global software services industry. gartner.com](https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/research/magic-quadrant)
ISO 27001 Information Security StandardISO 27001:2022 defines the internationally recognized information security management system requirements that Pharos Production operates under, shaping the control framework we inherit and extend for client software engagements. iso.org](https://www.iso.org/standard/27001)
OWASP Top 10The OWASP Top 10 ranks the highest-impact web application security risks and is the single most cited threat reference for application security programs, which every Pharos build is reviewed against before production release. owasp.org](https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/)
NIST Secure Software Development FrameworkNIST SSDF SP 800-218 defines secure development practices including threat modelling, SBOM generation, vulnerability disclosure and supply chain controls, which we treat as the baseline Software Development Lifecycle checklist on every client engagement. csrc.nist.gov](https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-218/final)
CNCF Cloud Native LandscapeThe CNCF Cloud Native Landscape maps the full cloud-native ecosystem across orchestration, runtime, observability, security and database categories, useful reference material we consult when validating platform choices for client Kubernetes and service mesh engagements. landscape.cncf.io](https://landscape.cncf.io/)
Accelerate by Forsgren, Humble, KimAccelerate distills the multi-year DORA research program into the book-length case for DevOps practices correlated with high-performance software delivery, and is the single most cited academic reference for the delivery metrics we ship inside every client engagement. itrevolution.com](https://itrevolution.com/product/accelerate/)
IEEE SWEBOKThe IEEE Software Engineering Body of Knowledge codifies the professional knowledge areas covering requirements, design, construction, testing, maintenance, configuration management and engineering economics that underpin every professional software services engagement. computer.org](https://www.computer.org/education/bodies-of-knowledge/software-engineering)

What we do not do

Engagements where the agency client expects to meet the actual development team
White-label work that violates the original agency contract
Projects where the agency cannot review or QA the work before delivery
Engagements without a named technical liaison on the agency side
Resale of work the original Pharos client did not authorize

White-label development at Pharos at a glance

White-label clients: 15+ active agency partners since 2017 across digital, marketing tech and product agencies
Confidentiality: NDA-bound; no logos, no case studies; partner names never disclosed
Engagement model: Multi-month, retainer-based; smallest engagement is a single engineer for 3 months
Communication: All client-facing communication routes through the agency; engineers are introduced under the agency brand
Pricing: White-label rates from $7,500/engineer/month with volume discounts above 5 engineers
Quality bar: Same code review, testing and delivery discipline as direct Pharos work
Honest default: We recommend co-branded delivery when the agency wants visibility, not white-label

White-label vs co-branded delivery vs staff augmentation

Three engagement models for the same kind of agency partnership. The right choice depends on whether the agency wants the Pharos team visible to the end client.

Factor	White-label	Co-branded delivery
Visibility	Pharos invisible	Pharos named on the deal
NDA scope	Strict; no case studies	Standard NDA; case studies allowed
Pricing	From $7,500/engineer/month	From $9,500/engineer/month
Best fit	Agency capacity buyout	Specialized partnership with shared brand
Communication	Routes through agency	Direct or routed (your choice)

How we run a white-label engagement

Pharos Verified Delivery applied to white-label means everything passes through the agency: branding, communication, status updates, demos, and final delivery. The Pharos team operates as a silent extension of the agency, never as a parallel vendor.

Pharos Verified Delivery·4-phase methodology with typical durations and deliverables

Week 0__Week 2-4__Week 8-24__Launch day__Ongoing

Technical validation
- Architecture proposal
- Scope refined estimate

0% on-schedule with discovery

Working demos every sprint
- CTO review at milestones
- ADRs documented

Transparent progress tracking

Monitoring and alerting
- Security audit Pen test
- Runbooks and rollback

ISO 27001 aligned

Security patches
- Performance tuning
- 4h SLA response

Continuous improvement

Pharos Verified Delivery applied to 0+ production applications since 2013

White-label engagements that delivered

White-label engagements only work when the agency partner can resell with confidence. Each engagement below ran for at least 12 months with active resale.

Agency capacity buyout (Q3 2024)Q3 2024 · Mid-size agency, US

Before

Agency winning 6-figure projects but losing them to capacity constraints; 4-month lead time on net-new work.

After

Stood up a 6-engineer white-label team running under the agency brand. Lead time dropped to 3 weeks; agency revenue up 38% in 2 quarters.

The agency interviewed every engineer. The end clients never knew Pharos existed. That is the entire point of white-label and we treat it seriously.

Specialty add-on (Q1 2025)Q1 2025 · Marketing tech agency, EU

Before

Agency selling marketing tech but unable to deliver custom data engineering for enterprise clients.

After

Pharos delivered data engineering work under the agency brand on 5 enterprise engagements. Win rate on enterprise tier rose from 22% to 51%.

White-label gave the agency a capability they could sell without hiring. We made sure the work was indistinguishable from in-house.

Recovery rescue (Q4 2024)Q4 2024 · Boutique agency, US

Before

Agency inherited a half-built project from a previous vendor with 14 weeks of debt and a frustrated client.

After

Quietly shipped the rescue under the agency brand within 9 weeks; client was never told the team had changed. Project delivered without losing the relationship.

White-label rescue work is high-trust. We do not get a logo, we do not get a case study, but the agency keeps the client and that is the deal.

Client names anonymized under NDA. Full case studies at /cases/.

When white-label is not the right fit

White-label only works when the agency wants a silent partner. When the agency wants visibility or co-marketing, the engagement model is different and we will say so.

Projects we decline

The agency wants Pharos visible on the deal
The end client expects a single integrated team
The agency has no technical liaison to review work
The work would obviously expose Pharos as a separate vendor (e.g., conflicting tooling)
The original Pharos engagement did not authorize resale of methods or code

What we suggest instead

When the agency wants to bring Pharos into the open, a co-branded delivery engagement is cleaner. When the agency wants integration, a staff-augmentation model with named engineers is the right shape. White-label is the silent option, and we treat it as such.

Pharos white-label portfolio

Pharos white-label delivery portfolio observations, 2020-2026

Observations from 8 white-label engagements 2020-2026 across FinTech, healthcare SaaS, HR tech and B2B enterprise portfolios.

6 of 8 Single-schema multi-tenancy 6 of 8 platforms we inherited had single-schema multi-tenancy. Migration to schema-per-tenant or RLS took 4-10 weeks and prevented at least 2 documented leak incidents per platform.[8]
4 hours Brand onboarding time Averaged 11 days on inherited systems. Self-serve pipelines compressed it to 4 hours median.
3 deals Compliance scoping unblocked sales Per-brand compliance scoping was the #1 sales blocker on 5 of 8 platforms. Documenting which frameworks apply per tenant unblocked 3 enterprise deals in quarter two.[7]
1.9x Per-tenant observability renewal lift Observability per tenant was missing on 7 of 8 platforms. Resellers who got per-brand dashboards renewed at 1.9x the rate of those who did not.

White-label software outlook 2026-2027

White-label software outlook 2026-2027 is shaped by the shift from cosmetic rebrand wrappers toward true multi-tenant platforms with per-brand compliance posture and tenant-scoped observability.

Multi-tenant isolation

Data, runtime and billing layer isolation replaced shared-instance white-labels after the 2023-2024 cross-tenant breach wave exposed shortcut architectures.[8]

Per-brand compliance attestation

Each reseller gets its own SOC 2 or ISO 27001 scope if needed; this became a contract gate for enterprise resellers.[7]

Self-serve branding pipelines

Logo, color, typography and email template pipelines compressed brand-onboarding time from weeks to hours.[3]

Tenant-scoped observability

Per-brand dashboards, SLOs and incident reports replaced blended platform metrics because resellers demand visibility into their customers.[4]

White-label platform 90-day evaluation template

Evaluate a white-label platform at the 90-day mark using this 8-point check before you onboard resellers past the pilot tier.

Tenant isolation

Separate schemas or databases, keys, storage and egress per brand.

Branding pipeline

Logos, colors, typography and email templates applied end-to-end within 2 hours of new tenant creation.

Per-tenant SLOs

Dashboards visible to the reseller without leaking cross-tenant data.[4]

Compliance scope

Which SOC 2, ISO 27001 or regional frameworks apply, documented per tenant.

Billing and metering

Per-tenant usage and invoice trails accurate to the cent.

Support escalation

Which party owns L1 and L2 tickets per brand, with runbook.

Upgrade cadence

Rolling vs. scheduled per tenant, with rollback pathway.

Data portability

Reseller can export their tenant data in a documented format.

Production post-mortem

Lesson from a 2024 white-label FinTech engagement

Seven resellers, 31 brands, 280k end-users. The original platform shared a single database with tenant_id discriminators on every query. Month 6 a schema migration introduced a query that forgot the tenant_id predicate and leaked 14 minutes of cross-tenant data before our canary caught it. We refactored over 8 weeks to schema-per-tenant with strict ORM-enforced scoping, added row-level-security as defense in depth and moved per-brand secrets to separate KMS keys.[8]

We also shipped per-tenant canary tests that simulate a cross-tenant query and alert if it returns a row. The rule every white-label now ships with: if tenant isolation is not encoded at multiple layers (schema, RLS, secrets, networking), it is not isolated.

Confidentiality note

White-label engagements are bound by a strict NDA on both sides. We do not publish case studies, logos or screenshots from white-label work. Anonymized lessons learned stay inside the Pharos knowledge base only.

Platforms We Work With

Trusted by Coinbase, Consensys, Core Scientific, MicroStrategy, Gate.io and 10+ more Web3 and enterprise platforms

-20756+ partners

Our 16 technology partners include:

Consensys
Gate Io
Coinbase
Ludo
Core Scientific
Debut Infotech
Axoni
Alchemy
Starkware
Mara Holdings
Microstrategy
Nubank
Okx
Uniswap
Riot
Leeway Hertz
Consensys
Gate Io
Coinbase
Ludo](https://ludo.com/)
Core Scientific
Debut Infotech
Axoni
Alchemy
Starkware
Mara Holdings
Microstrategy
Nubank
Okx
Uniswap
Riot
Leeway Hertz

Dmytro Nasyrov

Founder and CTO Pharos Production

Ask the founder a question

LinkedIn X (Twitter)

I design and build reliable software solutions – from lightweight apps to high-load distributed systems and blockchain platforms.

PhD in Artificial Intelligence, MSc in Computer Science (with honors), MSc in Electronics & Precision Mechanics.

13 years in architecture of great software solutions tailored to customer needs for startups and enterprises
23 years of practical enterprise customized software production experience
Lecturer at the National Kyiv Polytechnic University
Doctor of Philosophy in Artificial Intelligence
Master’s degree in Computer Science, completed with excellence
Master’s degree in Electronics and precision mechanics engineering

MVP

MVP sprint

Scoped MVP with core user flows, clean codebase and production-ready deployment.

$11,000 - $27,000

Popular choice

Production

Production release

Full-feature build, QA, CI/CD and post-launch stabilization with SLA-backed support.

$21,000 - $45,000

Full-cycle

Full-cycle platform

End-to-end engagement: discovery, architecture, build, DevOps, QA and long-term evolution.

$55,000 - $110,000

Prices vary based on project scope, complexity, timeline and requirements. Contact us for a personalized estimate.

Or select the appropriate interaction model

Request staff augmentation

Need extra hands on your software project? Our developers can jump in at any stage – from architecture to auditing – and integrate seamlessly with your team to fill any technical gaps.

Popular choice

Hire dedicated experts

Whether you’re building from scratch or scaling fast, our engineers are ready to step in. You stay in control, and we handle the code.

Outsource your project

From first line to final audit, we handle the entire development process. We will deliver secure, production-ready software, while you can focus on your business.

Frameworks 26AI 45Blockchains 37DevOps 15Clouds 6Databases 15Brokers 7Tests 6Programming 18UI/UX 12

Frameworks

Backend Frameworks 8

Spring Boot

Erlang OTP

\ \ NodeJS](/content/technologies/nodejs-development-services/index.html)

Phoenix

NestJS

Django FastAPI

Express.js

Front End Frameworks 8

\ \ React](/content/technologies/react-development-services/index.html)

Next.JS

Svelte

\ \ Angular](/content/technologies/angular-development-services/index.html) Vue.js

Remix

Astro

Nuxt.js

Mobile Apps Frameworks 10

\ \ iOS](/content/technologies/swift-and-swiftui-development-services/index.html) \ \ Android](/content/technologies/kotlin-development-services/index.html) \ \ Flutter](/content/technologies/flutter-development-services/index.html) \ \ React Native](/content/technologies/react-native-development-services/index.html)

Capacitors

Ionic

\ \ Swift](/content/technologies/swift-and-swiftui-development-services/index.html) \ \ Kotlin](/content/technologies/kotlin-development-services/index.html) \ \ Java](/content/technologies/java-development-services/index.html) Dart

AI and Machine Learning

LLM Providers 8

OpenAI GPT Anthropic Claude

Google Gemini

Meta Llama

Mistral AI

Cohere

Ollama

xAI Grok

AI Frameworks 15

LangChain LangGraph

CrewAI

AutoGen

Hugging Face PyTorch TensorFlow

scikit-learn

LlamaIndex Keras

XGBoost

LightGBM

OpenCV

spaCy

ONNX Runtime

Vector Databases 7

Pinecone

Weaviate

Qdrant

Chroma

pgvector

Milvus

FAISS

MLOps and Infrastructure 11

MLflow

Weights & Biases

DVC

Kubeflow

AWS SageMaker Azure ML Google Vertex AI

NVIDIA Triton

Airflow

Ray Serve

vLLM

AI Agent Tools 4

OpenAI Agents SDK Claude MCP

Semantic Kernel

Haystack

Blockchains

Private and Public Blockchains 33

Ethereum

TON

Corda

Tron

Hedera

Stellar

Consensys GoQuorum

Solana

Arbitrum

Binance Smart Chain (BSC)

Sei

Celo

Hyperledger

MultiversX

IOTA

Polkadot

Aptos

Neo

Flow

Algorand

Avalanche

EOS

Optimism

Polygon

Cosmos

Sui

Tezos

Ontology

Fantom

NEAR Protocol

VeChain

Base

IPFS

Cloud Blockchain Solutions 4

Amazon Managed Blockchain

Amazon QLDB

IBM Blockchain

Oracle Blockchain

DevOps

DevOps Tools 15

\ \ Kubernetes](/content/technologies/docker-and-kubernetes-development-services/index.html)

Terraform

\ \ Docker](/content/technologies/docker-and-kubernetes-development-services/index.html)

Istio

Prometheus

Grafana

Jenkins

ArgoCD

Ansible

GitHub Actions

GitLab CI

Pulumi

Datadog

New Relic

Vault

Clouds

Clouds 6

\ \ Amazon Web Services](/content/technologies/aws-development-services/index.html) \ \ Azure](/content/technologies/azure-development-services/index.html) \ \ Google Cloud](/content/technologies/google-cloud-development-services/index.html)

Cloudflare

Vercel

DigitalOcean

Databases

Databases 15

PostgreSQL

MySQL MariaDB

Redis

Cassandra

Neo4J

MongoDB

Elasticsearch

Solr

Ignite

ClickHouse

TimescaleDB

DynamoDB

Supabase

CockroachDB

ScyllaDB

Brokers

Event and Message Brokers 7

Kafka

RabbitMQ

Flink

Apache Pulsar

Amazon SQS

Amazon SNS

NATS

Tests

Test Automation Tools 6

Postman

Appium

Cucumber

Selenium

JMeter

Cypress

Programming

Programming Languages 18

\ \ Solidity](/content/technologies/solidity-development-services/index.html)

FunC

\ \ Rust](/content/technologies/rust-development-services/index.html) \ \ GoLang](/content/technologies/golang-development-services/index.html) \ \ Elixir](/content/technologies/elixir-development-services/index.html)

Erlang

C++

\ \ Java](/content/technologies/java-development-services/index.html)

JavaScript

\ \ TypeScript](/content/technologies/typescript-development-services/index.html)

Scala

Python C# .NET PHP Ruby Dart

SQL

UI/UX

UI/UX Design Tools 12

Figma

Zeplin

InVision

Sketch

Miro

Marvel

Balsamiq

Photoshop

Illustrator

After Effects

Corel Draw

Frameworks 26

Frameworks

Backend Frameworks 8

Spring Boot

Erlang OTP

\ \ NodeJS](/content/technologies/nodejs-development-services/index.html)

Phoenix

NestJS

Express.js

Front End Frameworks 8

\ \ React](/content/technologies/react-development-services/index.html)

Next.JS

Svelte

Remix

Astro

Nuxt.js

Mobile Apps Frameworks 10

Capacitors

Ionic

AI 45

AI and Machine Learning

LLM Providers 8

Google Gemini

Meta Llama

Mistral AI

Cohere

Ollama

xAI Grok

AI Frameworks 15

CrewAI

AutoGen

scikit-learn

XGBoost

LightGBM

OpenCV

spaCy

ONNX Runtime

Vector Databases 7

Pinecone

Weaviate

Qdrant

Chroma

pgvector

Milvus

FAISS

MLOps and Infrastructure 11

MLflow

Weights & Biases

DVC

Kubeflow

NVIDIA Triton

Airflow

Ray Serve

vLLM

AI Agent Tools 4

Semantic Kernel

Haystack

Blockchains 37

Blockchains

Private and Public Blockchains 33

Ethereum

TON

Corda

Tron

Hedera

Stellar

Consensys GoQuorum

Solana

Arbitrum

Binance Smart Chain (BSC)

Sei

Celo

Hyperledger

MultiversX

IOTA

Polkadot

Aptos

Neo

Flow

Algorand

Avalanche

EOS

Optimism

Polygon

Cosmos

Sui

Tezos

Ontology

Fantom

NEAR Protocol

VeChain

Base

IPFS

Cloud Blockchain Solutions 4

Amazon Managed Blockchain

Amazon QLDB

IBM Blockchain

Oracle Blockchain

DevOps 15

DevOps

DevOps Tools 15

\ \ Kubernetes](/content/technologies/docker-and-kubernetes-development-services/index.html)

Terraform

\ \ Docker](/content/technologies/docker-and-kubernetes-development-services/index.html)

Istio

Prometheus

Grafana

Jenkins

ArgoCD

Ansible

GitHub Actions

GitLab CI

Pulumi

Datadog

New Relic

Vault

Clouds 6

Clouds

Clouds 6

Cloudflare

Vercel

DigitalOcean

Databases 15

Databases

Databases 15

PostgreSQL

MySQL MariaDB

Redis

Cassandra

Neo4J

MongoDB

Elasticsearch

Solr

Ignite

ClickHouse

TimescaleDB

DynamoDB

Supabase

CockroachDB

ScyllaDB

Brokers 7

Brokers

Event and Message Brokers 7

Kafka

RabbitMQ

Flink

Apache Pulsar

Amazon SQS

Amazon SNS

NATS

Tests 6

Tests

Test Automation Tools 6

Postman

Appium

Cucumber

Selenium

JMeter

Cypress

Programming 18

Programming

Programming Languages 18

\ \ Solidity](/content/technologies/solidity-development-services/index.html)

FunC

Erlang

C++

\ \ Java](/content/technologies/java-development-services/index.html)

JavaScript

\ \ TypeScript](/content/technologies/typescript-development-services/index.html)

Scala

SQL

UI/UX 12

UI/UX

UI/UX Design Tools 12

Figma

Zeplin

InVision

Sketch

Miro

Marvel

Balsamiq

Photoshop

Illustrator

After Effects

Corel Draw

- -

0+ industry awards

Our Process

An approach to the development cycle

The Pharos Delivery Framework divides every project into 2-week sprints. After each sprint there is a retrospective of the work done, planning for the next sprint, a report of the work done and a plan for the next sprint. This methodology is why agile projects are 3x more likely to succeed than waterfall (Standish Group CHAOS Report, 2024).

2 days

Team Assembly

Our company starts and assembles an entire project specialists with the perfect blend of skills and experience to start the work.

1-4 months

MVP

We’ll design, build, and launch your MVP, ensuring it meets the core requirements of your software solution.

6-12 months

Production

We’ll create a complete software solution that is custom-made to meet your exact specifications.

Ongoing

Continuous Support

Our company will be right there with you, keeping your software solution running smoothly, fixing issues, and rolling out updates.

FAQ

Last updated: April 27, 2026

Quick answers to common questions about custom software development, pricing, process and technology.

Expand all (5)Collapse all (0)

Type to filter questions and answers. Use Topic to narrow the list.

Showing all 5

Clear filters

No matches

Try a different keyword, change the topic, or clear filters

Will Pharos appear in front of our clients?